Pseudoaneurisma intracraneal traumático tratado con desviadores de flujo: caso clínico y metaanálisis

Pseudoaneurisma intracraneal traumático tratado con desviadores de flujo: caso clínico y metaanálisis

Wei Huang 1, Qihang Pan 1, Zhao Ma 1, Jun Li 1, Wen Chen 1

1 Department of Neurosurgery, the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Wei Huang, Qihang Pan, Zhao Ma, Jun Li, Wen Chen

La información completa de afiliaciones y autor de correspondencia está disponible en la versión original en PDF.

*Correspondencia: Wen Chen. Email: ch_wen201@163.com

Wei Huang, Qihang Pan, Zhao Ma, Jun Li, Wen Chen*

Department of Neurosurgery, the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

*Correspondence: Wen Chen E-mail: ch_wen201@163.com

Date of reception: 10-07-2024Date of acceptance: 09-01-2025DOI: 10.24875/CIRU.24000378Cir Cir. 2026;94(4):362-369

Resumen

Introducción: El tratamiento de los pseudoaneurismas intracraneales traumáticos (TIPAs) con desviadores de flujo (FDs) es un tema controvertido. Presentamos el caso de una joven de 18 años que se sometió a un tratamiento con desviadores de flujo (FD) para una fístula carotídeo-cavernosa transcraneal derivada de una TIPA rota, y a continuación presentamos los resultados del metaanálisis más amplio realizado para evaluar la seguridad y la eficacia de los desviadores de flujo en esta situación.

Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en las bases de datos Web of Science, Embase y PubMed de artículos publicados entre 2010 y septiembre de 2022. De acuerdo con las directrices PRISMA, se incluyeron los estudios que informaban sobre DF para PAIT con ≥ 3 pacientes. Se evaluaron la tasa de oclusión completa, las complicaciones relacionadas con la operación y el resultado clínico. Se realizó un metaanálisis basado en la heterogeneidad utilizando modelos de efectos aleatorios o comunes.

Resultados: Se incluyeron siete estudios no comparativos con un total de 58 PAIT diana. Se describió explícitamente la rotura de 17 aneurismas. Todos los DF se liberaron con éxito. En total, 5 (8.6%) aneurismas se trataron con desviadores solapados. Durante un seguimiento angiográfico medio de 17.3 meses, la tasa de oclusión completa fue del 86.0% (46/56; IC 95%: 74-95; I2 = 7%; p = 0.37). La tasa de complicaciones relacionadas con la operación fue del 9% (IC 95%: 1-23; I2 = 0.00%; p = 0.52). Dos pacientes fallecieron por hemorragia no aneurismática. El porcentaje de buenos resultados clínicos fue del 85.7% (IC 95%: 78-98; I2 = 23.7%; p = 0.25) en el último seguimiento.

Conclusiones: Los DF proporcionan ventajas significativas en el tratamiento del PAIT. No obstante, las complicaciones relacionadas con la operación no son desdeñables. Son necesarias investigaciones prospectivas y aleatorizadas adicionales para determinar los efectos a largo plazo de los DF en los PAIT.

Palabras clave:  Pseudoaneurisma intracraneal traumático. Procedimientos endovasculares. Desviador de flujo. Complicación. Resultados. Metaanálisis.

Contenido

Id previo:  1239

Introduction

Traumatic intracranial aneurysm (TIPA) is a rare high-risk subtype of cerebral aneurysm secondary to head trauma or surgery with open craniotomy.1,2 Although the incidence is low, representing only 0.15-0.40% of all intracranial aneurysms,3 it is a difficult clinical problem with high morbidity and mortality.4,5 Because of their weak walls, these lesions have a very high incidence of early rebleeding and postoperative recurrence histologically.6 Both surgical and endovascular treatments (EVTs) are challenging as these lesions involve defective vessel walls.7 Traditional therapy, including parent artery occlusion, coil embolization, and covered stent8 implantation seemed to show high rates of complications and recurrence.3

More recently, Flow–Diverter Stents have been introduced as an alternative technique for complex aneurysms, and they have shown incredible results in facilitating endovascular remodeling.9,10 However, treating percutaneous transhepatic intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (PTIPs) with flow diverters (FDs) is controversial due to the unique challenges these aneurysms present. PTIPs have fragile, thin walls lacking normal vascular layers, which increases the risk of rupture. While FDs redirect blood flow to induce thrombosis, in PTIPs, this can put additional pressure on the already fragile aneurysm, potentially causing rupture. Furthermore, the efficacy of FDs in PTIPs is not well-supported by clinical evidence, and their use requires dual antiplatelet therapy, which can increase the risk of bleeding or complicate the management of these fragile aneurysms. Other treatment options, such as surgical trapping or coiling, may be considered due to these concerns. So far, there have been only a few retrospective case series and case reports. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis exploring FD’s angiographic and clinical outcomes for TIPA.

Methods

Case report

An 18-year-old girl suffered head trauma 1 month ago when she fell from a bicycle. Head computed tomography (CT) showed intracranial hemorrhage with skull base fracture. However, nearly 3 days ago, swelling of the right eye, blurred vision, and pulsatile murmur developed, and he came to our hospital. Magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were performed, and the diagnosis was confirmed as transcranial carotid-cavernous fistula, which drained into the superior ophthalmic vein through the cavernous sinus. The cause was considered to be the rupture of a TIPA in the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery. Then, the FD implantation combined with coil embolization was performed under general anesthesia. Although there was still a small amount of residue on angiography immediately after the operation, the patient’s murmur disappeared. Three months after the operation, the fistula disappeared, the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery was completely repaired, the eye symptoms disappeared, and there was no neurological dysfunction. The images were shown in figure 1.

Figure 1. Case images. An 18-year-old girl with transcranial carotid-cavernous fistula (TCCF) was treated with flow diverter. A: the magnetic resonance imaging suggested a TCCF on the right side (The hollow red arrow shows the enhanced cavernous sinus, and the solid red arrow indicates the thickened ophthalmic vein). B: anteroposterior angiography of the right internal carotid artery. C: lateral angiography of the right internal carotid artery. D: 3D reconstruction image (A single arrow shows a pseudoaneurysm in the cavernous segment). E: immediate angiography after operation. F: angiography after 3 months.

Literature search strategy

A comprehensive literature search of Web of Science databases, PubMed, and Embase was conducted for studies published between 2010 and September 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The keywords “aneurysm,” “intracranial aneurysm,” “pseudoaneurysm,” “PSA,” “trauma,” “traumatic,” “injury,” “flow diverter,” “flow diversion,” and “pipeline” were used in both “AND” and “OR” combinations.

Selection criteria

The systematic review used the following inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosed TIPA treated with FDs, (2) ≥ 3 patients undergoing FD implantation for TIPA, (3) clinical or angiographic outcomes were reported. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Extracranial aneurysm, (2) in vitro studies and animal studies, (3) technical notes, guidelines, and review articles.

Data extraction and critical appraisal

For each study, the patient demographic data and endovascular strategies were extracted. We looked at total occlusion, procedure-related complications, progress, death, and overall satisfactory result.

Data were retrieved from the paper text, tables, and figures, and each article was examined independently by two investigators. A senior investigator reviewed the final results. Because all of the analyses were based on previously published studies, there was no need for ethical approval or patient permission.

Statistical analysis

The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. Quality assessment was performed by two authors independently, and a third author solved potential discrepancies.

Meta-analysis was performed using the Meta package of the R software program (version 4.2.2). There are mean values for continuous variables and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous variables. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I2. We used a common effects model if I2 < 50%, but a random effects model if I2 > 50%, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted. It was determined that p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

Outcome measures

The term “aneurysm occlusion” was defined as complete occlusion as determined by imaging examinations (magnetic resonance angiography, CT angiography, and DSA) after the procedure. Complications were defined as any surgical treatment-related complications, including repeat bleeding, late hemorrhage, artery dissection, vessel occlusion, and brain infarction. Recurrent is defined as aneurysm enlargement or redevelopment. A good outcome was defined as 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale or 4-5 on the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Results

Through searches of 3 electronic databases, 369 articles were identified. After carefully examining the title or abstract, screening, and exclusion of duplicate or irrelevant articles, 7 studies with 57 patients were included. The literature search process is shown in figure 2. All studies were single-arm retrospective cohorts and had good quality. Their characteristics are summarized in table 1.

Figure 2. Flowchart of the study selection.

Table 1. Evaluation of the included studies using the modified Newcastle–Ottawa scale

Study Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study Comparability of cohorts based on the design or analysis Assessment of outcome Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts total
Barburoglua et al.32 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6
Sami et al.30 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6
Chen et al.29 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6
Deng et al.17 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6
Zhao et al.18 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6
Budohoski et al.10 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6
Dogan et al.31 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 6

Discussion

Our meta-analysis has demonstrated that flow-diverter stents are technically feasible with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion and technical success for the treatment of TIPAs. The procedure has a generally favorable clinical outcome. In spite of this, the complications associated with these aneurysms were not insignificant.

TIPA is a serious type of traumatic vascular injury.11 Although the incidence is not high, its natural course prognosis is poor. The mortality rate in ruptured TICA is 30-50%.3,12 Unruptured TIPAs are more likely to rupture than non-TIPAs.13,14 Thus, definitive and immediate treatments are particularly important for the prognosis of TIPAs patients.

TPIA is fusiform and fragile, without a true neck, and is most commonly linked with dissection.12 Historically, neurosurgical treatment was mostly restricted to the sacrifice of the parent artery or bypass,15 which was heavily reliant on the existence of sufficient collateral circulation. Due to the great trauma and poor effect of open surgery, endovascular therapy has been relatively a more common treatment in recent years.3 Detachable balloons, Coil, Onyx, Stent, etc., are used in the embolization of TIPAs.11,16 These methods did not reverse the pathological process of vascular injury, and a few pseudoaneurysms recurred during the follow-up. Following, covered stents are used for EVT of TIPAs.11,17 The therapeutic strategy was also gradually changed from the initial sacrificial parent artery to the parent artery reconstruction. However, the rigid design of these systems leads to poor vascular compliance. It is often difficult to achieve full adherence to intracranial vessels, and it is relatively difficult to deliver in more tortuous vessels. In addition, its completely covered surface has the risk of blocking the perforator artery. All of these limit its application to a small number of special cases.8,18,19

FDs were introduced recently in the treatment of giant or large wide-necked aneurysms along the petrous to a superior hypophyseal segment of the internal carotid artery.20 Moreover, due to its effect on endoluminal parent vessel reconstruction, the use of FD for intracranial aneurysms has increased in popularity with new indications continuing to be reported.9,21,22 FDs have already been successfully used in a few TIPAs.23–28 Giorgianni et al.27 reported a 20-year-old man with two traumatic ACA pseudoaneurysms treated with PED that resolved after 6 months on angiography in 2015, which is perhaps one of the earliest reported in the literature. An analysis of the angiographic and clinical outcomes of TIPAs treated with FDs was conducted to determine whether FDs are feasible compared to traditional EVT. In our meta-analysis of 46 FD-treated TIPAs, the complete occlusion rate was 86.0%. Stephanie et observed one case of progression of the pseudoaneurysm in short-term follow-up, which was suggested to be associated with nonapposition of the PED on the cavernous carotid wall. Zhao11 et al. report 9 TIPAs treated with FD. They discovered 3 failures of complete occlusion at the 6-month follow-up because of no use of coils. Although coiling is a useful technique, it is risky in the setting of a recent hemorrhage and unstable TIPA capsule. All of them were completely occluded at the second follow-up, indicating that the treatment of pseudoaneurysm with FD required a longer repair time.

Although the flow-directed device has changed the local hemodynamics of the aneurysm, it does not completely isolate the aneurysmal sac and remains at risk of recurrence and rebleeding.29 Meanwhile, greater attention must be paid to operation-related complications. We assessed the complication rate as 9%. Sami30 et al., and Dogan31 et al., reported iatrogenic rupture of the distal arterioles due to a microwire during the procedure. Barburoglu and Arat32 emonstrated an individual who had an asymptomatic occlusion of the parent artery that was discovered by chance during a 7-month follow-up angiography. This patient acknowledged stopping clopidogrel for many weeks between 3- and 7-month follow-up examinations.

The present meta-analysis presents several limitations. The main limitation is the minimal number of articles analyzed due to the scarcity of literature on this subject. All of the included studies were non-comparative, single-center, retrospective case series. In addition, the baseline characteristics varied across the included studies. The lack of stratification prevented us from analyzing the effect of age, gender, FDs brand, and aneurysm location.

Conclusions

FDs are feasible and provide significant advantages in the treatment of TIPA. Nevertheless, operation-related complications are not negligible. We emphasize the therapeutic potential of FDs in TIPAs and argue that further well-designed prospective and randomized trials are needed.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge everyone for their helpful contributions to this paper.

Funding

The authors declare that they have not received funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Protection of humans and animals. The authors declare that the procedures followed complied with the ethical standards of the responsible human experimentation committee and adhered to the World Medical Association and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Confidentiality, informed consent, and ethical approval. The authors have followed their institution’s confidentiality protocols, obtained informed consent from patients.

Declaration on the use of artificial intelligence. The authors declare that no generative artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this manuscript.

Bibliografía

1. Umansky D. Treatment of a traumatic pseudoaneurysm with a pipeline embolization device: case report and review of the literature. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. 2017;78:S1-S156.

2. Ghorbani M, Griessenauer CJ, Shojaei H, Wipplinger C, Hejazian E. Endovascular reconstruction of iatrogenic internal carotid artery injury following endonasal surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44:1797-804.

3. Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Segal R, Spivak A, Margolin E, Sviri G, et al. Results of endovascular treatment of traumatic intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:476-85; discussion 85-6.

4. Strauss SA, Power A, Nagpal SK, Tso MK, Brenner ML, DuBose JJ, et al. Endovascular and hybrid open and endovascular management of blunt and penetrating zone III carotid artery injuries. J Endovasc Resusc Trauma Manage. 2021;5:152-60.

5. Niu Y, Zhou S, Tang J, Miao H, Zhu G, Chen Z. Treatment of traumatic intracranial aneurysm: experiences at a single center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020;189:105619.

6. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Starke RM, Hasan D. The unusual angiographic course of intracranial pseudoaneurysms. Asian J Neurosurg. 2015;10:327-30.

7. Sylvester PT, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Dacey RG, Zipfel GJ, et al. Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:1256-76.

8. Wang W, Li MH, Li YD, Gu BX, Wang J, Zhang PL, et al. Treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysms with the Willis covered stent: a prospective study. J Trauma. 2011;70:816-22.

9. Patel PD, Chalouhi N, Atallah E, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, Zarzour H, et al. Off-label uses of the Pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E4.

10. Budohoski KP, Thakrar R, Voronovich Z, Rennert RC, Kilburg C, Grandhi R, et al. Initial experience with Pipeline embolization of intracranial pseudoaneurysms in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022;30:465-73.

11. Zhao R, Lu ZW, Deng XD, Zou C, Zuo Q, Zhao KJ, et al. Endovascular treatment of traumatic intracranial internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. Acad J Second Mil Med Univ. 2021;42:133-9.

12. Fleischer AS, Patton JM, Tindall GT. Cerebral aneurysms of traumatic origin. Surg Neurol. 1975;4:233-9.

13. Dolati P, Eichberg DG, Thomas A, Ogilvy CS. Application of pipeline embolization device for iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms of the extracranial vertebral artery: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Cureus. 2015;7:e356.

14. Brzezicki G, Rivet DJ, Reavey-Cantwell J. Pipeline embolization device for treatment of high cervical and skull base carotid artery dissections: clinical case series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:722-8.

15. Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Kahle KT, Sekhar LN, Ferreira MJ. Cerebrovascular bypass and aneurysm trapping for the treatment of an A2-segment anterior cerebral artery pseudoaneurysm and herniation through a skull base defect following trauma. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:149-51.

16. Phogat V, Gandhi A, Srivastava T, Mishva K. Endovascular management of intracranial pseudoaneurysm: an institutional experience. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2020;22:211-5.

17. Deng Q, Feng WF. Efficacy of pipeline endovascular device and Willis stent graft in the treatment of traumatic pseudo intracranial aneurysms. J Interv Med. 2020;3:45-8.

18. Zhao Y, Liu Z, Sun R, Pan L, Yang M, Song J, et al. The clinical efficacy analysis of treatment with a willis covered stent in traumatic pseudoaneurysm of the internal carotid artery. Front Neurol. 2021;12:739222.

19. Liu P, Yang M, Cai M, Qin J, Pan L. Treatment of pediatric traumatic intracranial pseudoaneurysm using endovascular covered stent: three case reports. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:693.e1-6.

20. Chancellor B, Raz E, Shapiro M, Tanweer O, Nossek E, Riina HA, et al. Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysm treatment: trials involving flow diverters and long-term outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2020;86:S36-45.

21. Atallah E, Saad H, Li J, Kumar A, Tjoumakaris S, Chalouhi N, et al. The experience with flow diverters in the treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019;17:8-13.

22. Iosif C, Mounayer C, Yavuz K, Saleme S, Geyik S, Cekirge HS, et al. Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms treated by extrasaccular flow diverters: midterm angiographic evolution and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:310-6.

23. Amenta PS, Starke RM, Jabbour PM, Tjoumakaris SI, Gonzalez LF, Rosenwasser RH, et al. Successful treatment of a traumatic carotid pseudoaneurysm with the Pipeline stent: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:160.

24. Cohen JE, Gomori JM, Moscovici S, Bala M, Itshayek E. The use of flow diverter stents in the management of traumatic vertebral artery dissections. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20:731-4.

25. Kim JD, Barber SM, Diaz OM, Li HK, Jackson RE, Hall D, et al. Post-traumatic amaurosis secondary to paraophthalmic internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm treated with pipeline embolization device. J Neuroophthalmol. 2013;33:359-62.

26. Prasad V, Gandhi D, Jindal G. Pipeline endovascular reconstruction of traumatic dissecting aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:e48.

27. Giorgianni A, Pellegrino C, Minotto R, Mercuri A, Frattini L, Baruzzi F, et al. Flow-diverter stenting of post-traumatic bilateral anterior cerebral artery pseudoaneurysm: a case report. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21:23-8.

28. Yan YZ, Wu YN, Zhao KJ, Pan Y, Huang Q. Endovascular treatment of traumatic carotid pseudoaneurysm with Tubridge flow diverter: a case report. Interv Neuroradiol. 2019;25:685-7.

29. Chen SH, McCarthy DJ, Sheinberg D, Hanel R, Sur S, Jabbour P, et al. Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intracranial pseudoaneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:E86-93.

30. Sami MT, Gattozzi DA, Soliman HM, Reeves AR, Moran CJ, Camarata PJ, et al. Use of Pipeline™ embolization device for the treatment of traumatic intracranial pseudoaneurysms: case series and review of cases from literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;169:154-60.

31. Dogan A, Ozan Durmaz M, Yüce G, Can Ezgu M. Treatment of traumatic internal carotid artery aneurysm by flow-diverter: a single-center experience. Neurochirurgie. 2022;68:e60-7.

32. Barburoglu M, Arat A. Flow diverters in the treatment of pediatric cerebrovascular diseases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 38:113-8.